As a supervisor who hires, trains and managers numerous
employees, I am NOT in favour of Ban TheBox. To be perfectly honest, I’m totally against it.
There is a reason job applications ask if an applicant is a
convicted felon. It’s for protection—person and property. In my 32+ years
hiring employees, many felons are repeat offenders. Many others are career
felons and a mere handful are those who made a mistake, paid their dues and
never did it again. The latter are the ones who should be given a chance. And
in my career, I have given plenty. Even though I get less and less background
checks that are blank—meaning the person committed NO crime, not even a DUI. That’s
just shameful.
Ban The Box
eliminates the question on job applications with the hopes that you will not
judge the applicant if they checked “yes” and by the time you’ve interviewed
the felon you will like them so much, and think they are so qualified, you will
hire them in spite of their criminal record.
I’m here to tell you, if you are a CAREER felon, I don’t
give a rat’s patootie how qualified you are, I will not hire you.
Now, if you made a mistake 20+ years ago and have had a
clean record since, absolutely, I will hire you, and as I said, I have.
This crap that it’s discriminatory
to ask if someone is convicted of a felon is BS. Is it also discriminatory to
have employees drug tested? Or are we
going to have to accept alcoholics and drug addicticts because it’s not fair
and they can’t help it? Is it discriminatory to get someone’s credit report
when their job duties include handling thousands and thousands of dollars? Or
how about when they work with children? Are we going to stop doing criminal
background checks and finger printing and eliminate the sexual predator’s list?
Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if we did eliminate all that. We are a
society where no one is responsible for any of their actions. And if they
perpetrate a crime, we owe them something. After all, we’re all entitled now.
I’m sick of this. It’s dangerous to carry a gun, but it’s
safe and acceptable to put employees and customers in danger with convicted
felons. And I do know of what I speak. I’ve had people apply for jobs who
committed assault and battery, robbery, identity theft, selling drugs, stalking
and even rape. And many of them lied on the application by saying “no” they committed
no felon. However, their arm-long criminal background shows they are career
criminals. And no, many are not 20+ years ago. Many aren’t even 10 years ago. I’ve
had them within one year, or less.
So, if you don’t want me to judge, DON’T COMMIT A CRIME.
Does alcohol show up on a drug test? And, wouldn't you have to show up to the test drunk (otherwise I think it leaves the system pretty quickly). As for banning the box, yeah, that's a good idea. The time behind bars is supposed to be the punishment, yet the punishing continues via job discrimination after the debt to society is paid. It isn't right, and likely causes many to re-offend.
ReplyDeleteHi Dervish.
DeleteWhere I work a person is tested for alcohol after an accident. So, if the employee was drinking, it would certainly show up.
I agree that the time behind bars is supposed to be punishment. And I take that into consideration when hiring IF the person has reformed.
And if people re-offend, then it's a character issue, imo.
We all have choices and I know people who have been down on their luck, so to speak, and they didn't commit a crime because of it. I also know people who grew up dirt poor but they didn't commit crimes. They worked hard and are doing well.
Thank you for stopping by!